Sunday, July 14, 2013

EdTech 542 Week 5: Planning and Preparing

It’s evident that a good PBL unit is inherently going to be multidisciplinary, in that it will touch upon a variety of content areas and utilize skills that are taught in other classes.  Tackling problems in the real world does not usually require information from only one academic domain.  Therefore, students’ projects should also feature an intersection of quantitative and qualitative reasoning, good verbal and written communication skills, scientific inquiry, of sorts, and social/societal perspectives.  It should also feature technology, as a creative and efficient means of production and publication.  The project I set out to design in this class hopefully checks all of these boxes. Specifically, it touches up English/Language Arts, Science, Social Studies, and Technology. The standards it addresses are from these four academic domains.  Math could be another entry point, but I tried to reign in the scope as little bit more for my first PBL project.  Plus, discussions of numbers and statistics will undoubtedly come up in research and in scientific exploration of the topic.

According to the BIE’s video “Designing Integrated Curriculum,” provided on the course Moodle, one of the benefits of interdisciplinary projects is good mapping of the overlap between subject areas.  When teachers from core (and non-core subjects) take the time to sit down and discuss their course objectives, standards, and vision, they can find various natural connection points.  In my own standards mapping for my lionfish project, I was surprised to see how many objectives overlapped almost directly.  This makes the instructional journey more efficient, more holistic, and should free up more time to delve deeper into the subject matter (the PBL driving question).  It also reminds teachers that are not alone – they have a professional support system.  No classroom has to be its own closed circuit.  Everyone works harder and smarter with the support of a team.

The video suggests a process of “starting backwards,” i.e. standing with the target goals of concept mastery and deciding what each instructor needs to do in his/her classroom to get students to that end point.  What specific skills must they learn to be successful for the final project/presentation?  From there they can create timelines and prioritize the sequence of activities for teachers whose content/skills must be presented more sequentially.  The planning process is more organized, and most of the “hard” work is done in advance of the project implementation.

Some of the difficulties of implementing interdisciplinary projects include finding the time to meet as a collective team of teachers, making sure all the teachers are on board with the philosophy of this teaching style, making sure there is a feasible timeslot within the school calendar, and making sure the administration is open to this innovation.  Another challenge is ensuring the students are open to and prepared for this style of learning, which may be a severe divergence from what they are accustomed to.  Parents, as well, should be informed of this project so that their questions are answered and fears are allayed. Advocacy is going to be part of interdisciplinary PBL, so there must be time and energy for that, which will have to come from within teaching team.

I don’t think it would be a problem making this a reality in my school because the Alberta curriculum’s standards are structured to overlap in very natural and significant ways.  The administration is open to innovation, and as a private school, they are not bound to “answer to” as many stakeholders as much as public institution would.  They are always looking for great collaboration and cutting edge educational design.  I think the most difficult part would be cheerleading the teachers in the middle school team to rethink their traditional units and plans and make time for a PBL unit.  Many teachers are complacent with their standard resources, instructional format, and closed-door philosophy of the classroom.  Getting them on board, as well as convincing them to devote their free time to planning this unit, would be the greatest challenge to implementation.  Nonetheless, if the energy and passion was there, it would be a rewarding process for everyone!

* * * * * * * *
Side note: One of the discussion board topics this week was to discuss a point of entry for a Web 2.0 technology skill in our own PBL unit.  Here is what I came up with:

Web 2.0 Activity:

The students will be using technology in many components of this project, ranging from Photoshop to Glogs, to Prezi/Powerpoint, to general Smartboard use, and so on.  The internet will feature heavily as they work to compile research and complete a WebQuest.

One new area of exploration for the students will be learning how to use Google Forms.

As part of the each interest groups’ presentation, the students will be required to create a short quiz to challenge and engage their peers with regard to the content of their presentation.  The audience will take the quiz online alongside the completion of their peer evaluation.  Although this will not be a formal teacher-recorded assessment, it will help the presenting group ensure their product is understandable, interesting, and memorable. It will also keep the information fresh and active in all students’ minds.

Sample quiz: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/formResponse?formkey=dEc1UUNxYW43TUFGM1dPTVdMX1FMVGc6MQ&theme=0AX42CRMsmRFbUy0wZjU3OGU5ZC0wNjIxLTQ2YWQtYmY1Zi1jNmJhZjFiNGQ0Yzk&ifq

Help in creating a Google Form: https://support.google.com/drive/answer/87809?hl=en (watch video first)

No comments:

Post a Comment